Tag Archives: healing

Comparing Matthew and Paul

Recently in my No Regrets blog I posted a reflection on the Parable of the Ten Virgins in Matthew 25:1-13. One of my readers commented that she didn’t find this message to be one of good news. In her comments this reader drew several contrasts between the message of the Gospel of Matthew and the writings of Paul. I will list four of her main claims and then respond to them.  I’m taking the trouble to respond to these four claims because I believe, taken together, they represent a dangerous heresy that has the potential to bring confusion and division to the church.

Jews or Gentiles?

Claim

My questioner claimed that Matthew is written for Jews whereas Paul’s message is for Gentiles.

Response

This does contain a kernel of truth. During the first couple of decades after the resurrection, many Jews came to faith in Jesus as Messiah, as one can see from reading the Book of Acts. It’s generally agreed among scholars and students of the Bible that Matthew was written for Jews who either had believed in Jesus or were open to believing in him.  Also, Matthew records that during his earthly ministry of preaching and healing, Jesus had a strong focus on reaching out to the lost sheep of the House of Israel (Matthew 10:5-6,,  Matthew 15:24). However, this was a strategic focus for a limited time period.  He wanted to offer Israel an opportunity to hear the good news of the Kingdom and to repent.

However, Matthew’s message is not only for Jews. Although Jesus focussed primarily on Jews during his earthly ministry of preaching and healing, Matthew also presents him as showing God’s mercy and kindness to Gentiles who put their hope in the God of Israel. Here are some examples.

  • Healing of the centurion’s servant  – Matthew 8:5-13
  • Healing of two demonized men in the region of the Gadarenes. This was Gentile territory, as can be seen from the presence of a herd of pigs. Matthew 8:28-34.
  • Healing of the Canaanite woman’s daughter – Matthew 15:28

It’s significant that in the accounts of the centurion’s servant and the Canaanite woman’s daughter, Jesus draws attention to the faith of these Gentiles. Clearly, like Paul, Jesus did present salvation as being based on a response of faith to the good news of God’s mercy. Also, when commenting on the centurion’s faith, Jesus specifically states that many (from other nations) will come and join Abraham, Isaac and Jacob in the feast at the Kingdom (Matthew 8:10-11).

Also, we shouldn’t overlook the Great Commission which concludes Matthew’s gospel.  In this famous passage, Jesus directs his apostles to make disciples of all nations (Matthew 28:19-20). Clearly he understood the gospel to be a message for Gentiles as well as Jews.

As for Paul, it’s worth noting that he also had a strategic focus on presenting the gospel to Jews first, and then to Gentiles. In his preaching tours with Barnabas (Acts 13-14) and Silas (Acts 16-17) it was his regular practice to seek out a synagogue and begin his ministry there.  He clearly maintains this priority in his famous statement about not being ashamed of the gospel. He declares that the gospel of Christ is “the power of God for salvation to everyone who believes, to the Jew first and also to the Greek [Gentile]” ( Romans 1:16) 

The cross

Claim

My questioner claimed that Matthew contains a pre-cross message whereas Paul’s letters contain a message based on the sacrifice of Jesus on the cross.

Response

There is no doubt that Paul’s message centers on the cross of Jesus Christ, and that he presents faith in Jesus’ sacrifice as the key to salvation for both Jews and Gentiles.

It’s also true that the teachings of Jesus recorded in Matthew were spoken before the cross, but they were clearly spoken with the cross in view.

In Matthew 1:21 the angel reveals to Joseph that the child to be born will save his people from their sins. Although he doesn’t specifically mention the cross, it’s clear that he saw Jesus as a redeemer, not just a law-giver.

Matthew links Jesus’ healing ministry to the work of the cross (Matt 8:17) with a reference to Isaiah 53:4-5 which is part of the great passage where Isaiah prophesies that a suffering servant would give his life for his people’s salvation.

In responding to criticism from the Pharisees who ask him for a sign to authenticate his ministry of deliverance and healing, Jesus says the only sign he will give them is the sign of Jonah (Matthew 12:39-40). This is a clear reference to the cross and resurrection.

In Matthew 16:21, 17:22-23, 20:17-20 and 26:1-2,  Jesus warns his disciples that he will soon be delivered up to be crucified. Both Jesus and Matthew, his disciple, had the cross clearly in view.

In Matthew 20:28 Jesus says that He came to give his life as a ransom for many. Again this is the message of salvation by His sacrifice on the cross.

But the message of the cross is not only about how we are redeemed and forgiven. It’s also a way of life in which we are to follow. Both Matthew and Paul speak of this.

Just after Peter confesses Jesus as the Christ (Messiah), Jesus begins to speak openly to his disciples about the coming cross. (Matthew 16:21).  He follows this by telling his disciples that they too need to take up their cross and be willing to lose their life for the gospel (Matthew 16:24-26).

For whoever would save his life will lose it,
but whoever loses his life for my sake will find it

Far from being contrary to the message of Paul, this is completely consistent with what Paul says in Philippians 3:8-11

Indeed, I count everything as loss because of the surpassing worth of knowing Christ Jesus my Lord. For his sake I have suffered the loss of all things and count them as rubbish, in order that I may gain Christ and be found in him, not having a righteousness of my own that comes from the law, but that which comes through faith in Christ, the righteousness from God that depends on faith— that I may know him and the power of his resurrection, and may share his sufferings, becoming like him in his death, that by any means possible I may attain the resurrection from the dead.

Grace or works?

Claim

My questioner claimed that Matthew’s message is one of salvation by obeying the works of the law, in contrast to Paul’s message which she characterized as a message of salvation by grace through faith.

Response

When Jesus healed a paralyzed man (Matthew 9:1-8) , Matthew tells us that when he saw their faith, he told the man that his sins were forgiven. When the Pharisees questioned him, he healed the man and then said that this showed that he had authority on earth to forgive sins. This is clearly a message of grace. The man had done nothing to deserve this but Jesus was responding to the faith shown by this man and his friends.  In the same way, in Matthew 9:10-13, Jesus welcomed sinners to the table and told the Pharisees that he had not come to call the righteous but sinners.

In Matthew 9:22 and 9:29 (as well as many other places) he told people that they were being healed because of their faith. It’s interesting that the Greek word for healed is the very same word for saved. Jesus healed and saved people by grace through faith, and this is clearly demonstrated in the Gospel of Matthew.

It’s also true that throughout the Gospel of Matthew Jesus calls his disciples to a higher standard of righteousness than the Law of Moses. In the Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 5-7) he is presented as a sort of new Moses, replacing some of the commands of the law with their true spiritual meaning (You have heard … but I say) . In this way he fulfilled the law (Matthew 5:19-20) and also fulfilled Moses’ prophecy that God would raise up for Israel a prophet like him (Deuteronomy 18:15). But Jesus  was clearly speaking of a righteousness that cannot be attained by human effort. Rather than outward righteousness, it was inward righteousness. For example, his teaching on adultery, anger and forgiveness is only possible with a changed heart. This is why he says a healthy tree cannot bear bad fruit (Matthew 7:18) , and Make the tree good and its fruit will be good (Matthew 12:33). Who can make the tree of one’s life good (pure)? Only Jesus. He was always attacking the outward religion of the Pharisees and pointing to the need for transformation of the heart. So if this is properly understood it is completely consistent with Paul’s message of grace.

Paul did very clearly state that we are justified by faith (Galatians 2:16, Romans 3:28, Ephesians 2:8) and emphasized that no-one can be justified by works of the law because no-one can keep the law perfectly by their own efforts . But he also made it very clear that anyone who was truly justified would have a changed character. This is clear from Romans 6:15-18 and many other passages. Paul specifically stated that those who continue in sin will not inherit the Kingdom of God (Galatians 5:19-21, 1 Corinthians 6:9-11).

Good News

Claim

My questioner claimed that Matthew’s message is not good news for the believer but rather a hard message of judgment. The message of Paul is a message of grace and is therefore good news for the believer, conveying God’s acceptance of the sinner.

Response

Matthew 1:21  Words of the angel to Joseph before Jesus’ birth – “You are to give him the name Jesus, for He will save his people from their sins”. This saying is only found in Matthew. He links the meaning of Jesus’ name (Yeshua, meaning Yahweh is salvation) with the purpose of his coming.

Matthew 11:4-6 Jesus’ response to John the Baptist “the poor have good news preached to them”. Clearly Jesus understood his own message to be one of good news for those who were humble enough to receive it.  He also said that those who are not offended with him are blessed.

Matthew 13:44-46  In the Parables of the Hidden Treasure and a Pearl of Great Price, Jesus speaks of the message of the Kingdom as a valuable treasure, something wonderful and greatly to be desired. Sounds like good news to me!

Matthew 18:10-14 In the Parable of the Lost Sheep Jesus makes it clear that it’s not his Father’s will for anyone to perish.

Matthew 19:25-26 when the disciples asked who can be saved (speaking specifically of people who were addicted to their great wealth), Jesus responded “With man this is impossible, but with God all things are possible”. In other words, by the mercy of God even very imperfect people who cannot possibly live up to God’s standards on their own can be saved by the power of God.

Matthew 20:15-16 At the conclusion of the Parable of the Labourers in the Vineyard, Jesus says that the owner of the vineyard (God) is justified in giving the same reward to those who come to the vineyard at the last minute as to those who have worked all day. The point of this parable is that those who repent and turn to God at the last minute (the despised tax collectors and sinners, as well as Gentiles)  will receive the same reward as those who have worked hard to serve the Lord all their lives. This is a message about God’s radical goodness and generosity (which is the underlying meaning of the word grace – it’s about a free, undeserved gift).

Matthew 20:34 gives kindness (compassion) as the motive for Jesus’ action in healing two blind beggars. The same motivation of kindness and compassion (grace) is spoken of in Matthew 9:36 and several other accounts of healing.

Matthew 21:14 Jesus heals the blind and the lame in the Temple. This might not seem like a big deal but in Leviticus 21:18 the blind and the lame were barred from entering the assembly of the Lord because they were disfigured and therefore imperfect. By healing the blind and the lame at the temple Jesus is demonstrating that He makes a way for otherwise unqualified people to draw near and approach God.

Matthew 22:10 in the Parable of the Wedding Feast, the master opens up the invitation to all who are willing to come in, “both bad and good”.  The only one who is rejected is one who has no wedding garment – i.e. the robe of righteousness (Isaiah 61:10) , which only Jesus can give.

Conclusion

There is much more that could be said about all this, but I think I have made my point.

The conclusion of the matter is that the good news of God’s grace is clearly presented in both Matthew’s gospel and Paul’s letters. It’s the same gospel although presented differently.

There is no doubt that warnings of judgement are also found both in the Gospel of Matthew and in Paul’s letters. God’s character has not changed. He is full of mercy to those who repent but He will judge those who do not repent and turn to him with their whole hearts.

Jesus offers mercy and grace but also calls us to be holy. The holiness to which he calls us is not attainable without his mercy and grace. He died to set us free from sin so that we could live in a new way and inherit the Kingdom of God. Though the message is framed differently in Matthew’s gospel than in Paul’s letters, because they were two different men writing to different audiences, the core of the message is one and the same.

 

Share Button

John 5:1-15

Jesus returns to Jerusalem and heals a crippled man

Recall that in chapter 4 Jesus had returned to Galilee because his ministry had been attracting too much attention from the Pharisees (John 4:1-3).

Scene 1 : the pool of Bethesda (vs 1-4)
After this there was a feast of the Jews, and Jesus went up to Jerusalem. Now there is in Jerusalem by the Sheep Gate a pool, which is called in Hebrew, Bethesda, having five porches. In these lay a great multitude of sick people, blind, lame, paralyzed, waiting for the moving of the water. For an angel went down at a certain time into the pool and stirred up the water; then whoever stepped in first, after the stirring of the water, was made well of whatever disease he had.

vs 1 – a feast of the Jews
There were three annual feasts for which observant Jews were expected to go to Jerusalem – Passover, Pentecost and Tabernacles. We don’t know which of these feasts is referred to here. However, the reference to people lying outdoors might suggest Pentecost because the weather would have been cooler at Passover and Tabernacles.

vs 2– a pool, which is called in Hebrew, Bethesda
Archeological digs have found a pool and porticoes which nicely fit this description, another example of confirmation of John’s trademark geographical details.

vs 4-an angel went down at a certain time into the pool and stirred up the water
Many translations do not include the portion about the moving of the water by an angel. This is because not all manuscripts of the NT Greek text include these verses. Some scholars believe that these verses were not part of the original text. Others argue that these verses are most likely part of the original text, because verse 7 (which all manuscripts include) refers to the waters being stirred, and this reference makes no sense unless the part about the angel stirring the waters is included. I have used the NKJV for this section of John because it includes these verses, and with them the story hangs together better. See further discussion below.

Scene 2 : healing of a crippled man (vs 5-9)
Now a certain man was there who had an infirmity thirty-eight years. When Jesus saw him lying there, and knew that he already had been in that condition a long time, He said to him, “Do you want to be made well?” The sick man answered Him, “Sir, I have no man to put me into the pool when the water is stirred up; but while I am coming, another steps down before me.” Jesus said to him, “Rise, take up your bed and walk.” And immediately the man was made well, took up his bed, and walked. And that day was the Sabbath.

vs 5– thirty-eight years – almost a lifetime.  Imagine the resignation that must have set in. This man was probably deeply discouraged.

vs 6 – Do you want to be made well?  What thoughts might have been going through the crippled man’s mind when Jesus asked him this question?

vs 7 – Sir, I have no man to put me into the pool when the water is stirred … another steps down before me,  What state of mind do these words this reflect? What was this man’s expectation and experience concerning the availability of the grace of God?

vs 8 – Rise, take up your bed, and walk – What happened when Jesus spoke these words?

vs 9 – Immediately the man was made well, took up his bed, and walked – What a contrast between the religious tradition (which said that healing was possible but intermittent and only for a few) and the ministry of Jesus which grants immediate access to the goodness of God.

    • the man’s faith was weak and almost non-existent
    • he was clinging to a religious tradition that kept him in captivity because it was all he had
    • he wanted healing but didn’t expect it
    • he was completely unable to help himself in any way – his best attempts were useless
    • Jesus gave him a free and totally unexpected gift

vs 9 – And that day was the Sabbath – See  Mark 2:27. Why is this significant?

Scene 3 : reaction of the Jewish authorities (vs 10-13)
The Jews therefore said to him who was cured, “It is the Sabbath; it is not lawful for you to carry your bed.” He answered them, “He who made me well said to me, ‘Take up your bed and walk.’ ” Then they asked him, “Who is the Man who said to you, ‘Take up your bed and walk’?” But the one who was healed did not know who it was, for Jesus had withdrawn, a multitude being in that place. 

vs 10 – the Jews therefore said to him – when John uses the phrase the Jews he is referring to the Jewish authorities. The man who was cured was also a Jew, as were all the characters in the story.

vs 10 – It is the Sabbath; it is not lawful for you to carry your bed – The Torah did not specifically say anything about carrying one’s mat on the Sabbath. It was the tradition of the elders (see Matthew 15:2-3) that laid down these interpretive rules which made the Law seem so burdensome. They were so focussed on their religious rules that they hardly noticed the wonderful miracle of the man’s healing.

vs 13 – for Jesus had withdrawn, a multitude being in that place  – Jesus was still trying to avoid too much attention from the authorities. His time had not yet come (see John 7:6 )

Scene 4 : Jesus finds the healed man in the Temple (vs 14-15)
Afterward Jesus found him in the temple, and said to him, “See, you have been made well. Sin no more, lest a worse thing come upon you.” The man departed and told the Jews that it was Jesus who had made him well.

vs 14 – Afterward Jesus found him in the temple – Why did Jesus go and look for this man? Why do you think the man was in the temple?

vs 14 – “See, you have been made well. Sin no more, lest a worse thing come upon you.” – Why did Jesus say this? What do you think he meant by a worse thing? Why did he consider it important to tell the man this? Would this be considered acceptable speech in today’s culture?

Reflection 

This man was completely helpless and yet Jesus healed him and empowered him to walk. What does this tell you about your own salvation?

Share Button

John 4:43-54

Jesus returns to Galilee and heals a court official’s son

vs 43-45 – Return to Galilee from Judea

After the two days he departed for Galilee. (For Jesus himself had testified that a prophet has no honor in his own hometown.) So when he came to Galilee, the Galileans welcomed him, having seen all that he had done in Jerusalem at the feast. For they too had gone to the feast.

  • the two days (vs 43) – the extra two days that he had spent in Sychar at the request of the Samaritans.  See vs 40.
  • departed for Galilee (vs 43) – see vs 1-3.  The visit to the Samaritans happened while Jesus was on the way from Judea to Galilee.
  • a prophet has no honor in his own hometown (vs 44) – see Matthew 13:57, Mark 6:4, Luke 4.24
  • the Galileans welcomed him, having seen all that he had done in Jerusalem (vs 45) – is it possible to “love” Jesus’ miracles and yet not love or honor Jesus himself?
vs 46-48 – a court official asks Jesus to heal his son

So he came again to Cana in Galilee, where he had made the water wine. And at Capernaum there was an official whose son was ill. When this man heard that Jesus had come from Judea to Galilee, he went to him and asked him to come down and heal his son, for he was at the point of death. So Jesus said to him, “Unless you [people] see signs and wonders you will not believe.”

  • Cana … Capernaum (vs 46) – these two towns were about 25 km apart. Cana was about 100 meters above sea level, situated on a limestone outcropping. Capernaum was on the shores of Lake Gennesaret (Sea of Galilee), about 200 meters below sea level.
  • official (vs 46) – probably attached to the court of Herod Antipas.
  • this man heard that Jesus had come from Judea to Galilee  (vs 47) – Evidently Jesus had become known as a healer and teacher.
  • he went to him and asked him to come down and heal his son (vs 47) – they didn’t have cars. This was a journey of several hours. They were in hilly terrain, probably travelling on foot,
  • Unless you [people] see signs and wonders you will not believe (vs 48) – Galileans in general, not just this man. Still, Jesus seemed to be putting him off. Why did he do this?
  • signs and wonders – why does God grant them? Should we seek them? Is it better to believe without signs? What does the Word say about this?  In Matthew 8:13 Jesus praises the centurion who believed before receiving a miracle, then grants him a miracle. What does this tell us? In Matthew 9:35-38 it seems evident that healing miracles done by Jesus were a major part of his ministry, yet in Matthew 12:38-39 he rebukes the scribes and Pharisees for asking for yet another sign. In Acts 2:42-47 it seems evident that signs done by the apostles played a part in the great numbers of people who were being saved. Again, what does this tell us?

vs 49-51

The official said to him, “Sir, come down before my child dies.” Jesus said to him, “Go; your son will live.” The man believed the word that Jesus spoke to him and went on his way.
As he was going down, his servants met him and told him that his son was recovering.

  • Sir, come down before my child dies … Go; your son will live. (vs 49-50)  – the man pleads with Jesus and Jesus grants him a miracle. What other story does this remind you of? By telling him to go home, what is Jesus asking of this man?
  • The man believed … and went on his way …. As he was going down, his servants met him and told him that his son was recovering (vs 50-51) What does this show us about God’s ways of dealing with us?

vs 52-54

So he asked them the hour when he began to get better, and they said to him, “Yesterday at the seventh hour the fever left him.”  The father knew that was the hour when Jesus had said to him, “Your son will live.” And he himself believed, and all his household. This was now the second sign that Jesus did when he had come from Judea to Galilee.

John 2-11 is sometimes referred to by scholars as the Book of Signs, whereas John 12-20 is called the Book of Glory. John lists only seven signs (miracles) of Jesus but each one has special significance.

  • he asked them the hour … The father knew that this was the hour (vs 52-53)  – Why is this significant? Why does John mention it?
  • he himself believed, and all his household (vs 53) – the goal of John’s gospel.  See John 20:30-31
  • the second sign (vs 54) – what was the first? what are signs to John and why are they important?
  • Note that Jesus’ prophetic word to the Samaritan woman, although clearly of heavenly origin (a work of the Spirit) and having great power to change her life, is not called a sign by John. He uses this term to refer to physical miracles, and selects seven (of a much larger number – see John 20:30) to highlight key aspects of Jesus’ identity and ministry.

Reflection

  • What is God saying to us through this miracle story?
  • Do you need signs to bolster your faith?
Share Button