Monthly Archives: May 2023

Oaths (Keeping your Word) – Matthew 5:33-37

Matthew 5:33-37 – Sermon on the Mount

[33] Again you have heard that it was said to those of old, “You shall not swear falsely, but shall perform to the Lord what you have sworn.” [34] But I say to you, Do not take an oath at all, either by heaven, for it is the throne of God, [35] or by the earth, for it is his footstool, or by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the great King. [36] And do not take an oath by your head, for you cannot make one hair white or black. [37] Let what you say be simply “Yes” or “No”; anything more than this comes from evil.

Background

Oaths were used as a way of adding solemnity to a promise. If I borrow your car and say “I swear I will bring it back unharmed”, I am taking an oath.  Taking oaths was a common practice in the ancient world in matters that were considered to be of high importance. Oath taking was allowed for in the Law of Moses, with stipulations that an oath should not be taken lightly but that the promised action should be performed. See Numbers 30:2. God himself is presented as taking oaths in Scripture.  See Psalm 110:4, Hebrews 7:15-22.

Commentary

Since God cannot lie (Numbers 23:19, Titus 1:2), he does not use oaths to certify his truthfulness in a matter of dispute, but rather to underline the solemnity of a covenant promise.

Fallen humans, on the other hand, are prone to deception (Psalm 116:11) and moral lapses (Proverbs 20:6) and are quite capable of misusing oaths to avoid keeping a promise.

The following excerpts from an online resource may be helpful

The Westminster Confession of Faith says oaths are appropriate only in “matters of weight and moment” (22.2). This reflects a biblical pattern wherein oaths are commonly associated with covenants (Gen. 26:3; Psalm 132.11). We should make vows only in matters of great and lasting consequence, such as marriages or court proceedings.

Understanding common first-century Jewish practices helps us see what our Savior was getting at in His teaching on oaths and vows. To keep people from breaking the law’s rules regarding our promises (Num. 30:1–2), Jewish teachers and leaders invented a system by which they could determine whether a vow had to be kept. Extrabiblical literature indicates that many rabbis did not consider it a sin to break a vow if it was not made explicitly in the name of God. Oaths made in the name of heaven or even the gold of the temple were not regarded as ultimately binding. As we might expect from sinners, this led to people making oaths by persons or objects other than God to give them an out in case they did not keep their word.

Taken from Jesus’ Teaching on Oaths by Ligonier MInistries, 2012.

Jesus’ condemnation of the Pharisees’ teaching on oaths bears out these points

Matthew 23:16-22 – Teaching of the Pharisees on oaths

[16] Woe to you, blind guides, who say, “If anyone swears by the temple, it is nothing, but if anyone swears by the gold of the temple, he is bound by his oath.” [17] You blind fools! For which is greater, the gold or the temple that has made the gold sacred? [18] And you say, “If anyone swears by the altar, it is nothing, but if anyone swears by the gift that is on the altar, he is bound by his oath.” [19] You blind men! For which is greater, the gift or the altar that makes the gift sacred? [20] So whoever swears by the altar swears by it and by everything on it. [21] And whoever swears by the temple swears by it and by him who dwells in it. [22] And whoever swears by heaven swears by the throne of God and by him who sits upon it.

Discussion
  • Do you think the Pharisees’ teaching on oaths encouraged truthfulness? Why, or why not?
  • Consider Jesus’ concluding statement on this matter:
    Let what you say be simply “Yes” or “No”; anything more than this comes from evil.
    (Matthew 5:37)
  • What was he getting at?
  • See Matthew 15:10-20, Psalm 51:6-10.  What kind of heart does God desire to form in us?.
Share Button

Marriage and Divorce – Matthew 5:31-32, Matthew 19:3-12

Matthew 5:31-32

[31] It was also said, “Whoever divorces his wife, let him give her a certificate of divorce.” [32] But I say to you that everyone who divorces his wife, except on the ground of sexual immorality, makes her commit adultery, and whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery.

  • This is another example of Jesus’ sovereign authority over the law as given by Moses.
    In every case where Jesus comments directly on the law of Moses, he zeroes in on the core issue – the response of the heart to God (see Matthew 5:20 ).
  • The way the discussion is framed assumes that the initiative in divorce rests with the husband. This is a reflection of the culture of the times. However in today’s culture, in which divorce can be initiated by either party, the same principle applies to both husbands and wives.
  • The Pharisees later questioned Jesus on this matter of divorce. His discussion with them adds powerful insight into the true intentions of the One who gave the law.

Matthew 19:3-6
[3] And Pharisees came up to him and tested him by asking, “Is it lawful to divorce one’s wife for any cause?” [4] He answered, “Have you not read that he who created them from the beginning made them male and female, [5] and said, ‘Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh’? [6] So they are no longer two but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let not man separate.”

  • Why did the Pharisees ask Jesus this question?
  • How did Jesus deal with this challenge?
  • The standard Jesus sets for marriage is life-long faithfulness. What is his basis for this standard?
Matthew 19:7-9

[7] They said to him, “Why then did Moses command one to give a certificate of divorce and to send her away?” [8] He said to them, “Because of your hardness of heart Moses allowed you to divorce your wives, but from the beginning it was not so. [9] And I say to you: whoever divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another, commits adultery.”

  • According to Jesus, why does the law of Moses allow for divorce?
  • What does hardness of heart have to do with marital failure?
  • What does Jesus mean by the statement from the beginning it was not so ?
Matthew 19:10-12

[10] The disciples said to him, “If such is the case of a man with his wife, it is better not to marry.” [11] But he said to them, “Not everyone can receive this saying, but only those to whom it is given. [12] For there are eunuchs who have been so from birth, and there are eunuchs who have been made eunuchs by men, and there are eunuchs who have made themselves eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. Let the one who is able to receive this receive it.”

  • How did Jesus’ disciples respond to this teaching? Restate their response in your own words.
  • What does Jesus mean by saying only those to whom it is given [vs 11] ?
    See 1 Corinthians 7:1-7.
  • Does Jesus view marriage as inferior to singleness?
  • What is a eunuch?
  • How do you make yourself a eunuch for the sake of the Kingdom of heaven [vs 12]? What might Jesus mean by this? See Matthew 5:29-30.
Prayer
Share Button

Dealing with desire – Matthew 5:27-30

Matthew 5:27-28

You have heard that it was said, “You shall not commit adultery.” But I say to you that everyone who looks at a woman with lustful intent has already committed adultery with her in his heart. 

[29] You have heard that it was said, “You shall not commit adultery.”
[30] But I say to you that everyone who looks at a woman with lustful intent has already committed adultery with her in his heart.
Matthew 5:29-30

If your right eye causes you to sin, tear it out and throw it away. For it is better that you lose one of your members than that your whole body be thrown into hell.  And if your right hand causes you to sin, cut it off and throw it away. For it is better that you lose one of your members than that your whole body go into hell.

  • What is Jesus’ point here?
  • Is he literally recommending maiming ourselves? If not, what is he getting at?
  • What happens to us if we indulge and make allowances for wrongful desires?
  • What was David’s response when the prophet Nathan rebuked him for his sin with Bathsheba?  See 2 Samuel 12:7-15, Psalm 51
  • How do we root out destructive desires?
Share Button

Anger and Reconciliation — Matthew 5:21-26

Matthew 5:21-26

[21] You have heard that it was said to those of old, “You shall not murder; and whoever murders will be liable to judgment.” [22] But I say to you that everyone who is angry with his brother will be liable to judgment; whoever insults his brother will be liable to the council;
and whoever says, “You fool!” will be liable to the hell of fire. [23] So if you are offering your gift at the altar and there remember that your brother has something against you, [24] leave your gift there before the altar and go. First be reconciled to your brother, and then come and offer your gift. [25] Come to terms quickly with your accuser while you are going with him to court, lest your accuser hand you over to the judge, and the judge to the guard, and you be put in prison. [26] Truly, I say to you, you will never get out until you have paid the last penny.

Uprooting anger and rage – verses 21-22

[21] You have heard that it was said to those of old,
“You shall not murder; and whoever murders will be liable to judgment.”
[22] But I say to you
  • What does this simple statement tell us about Jesus?
that everyone who is angry with his brother will be liable to judgment;
  • See 1 John 3:15, Ephesians 4:26
  • The Greek for everyone who is angry is a present participle, denoting ongoing action (the state of being angry or remaining angry).  Jesus is not speaking of a momentary flash of irritation, but of anger that is allowed to fester.
  • Why is it so dangerous to allow anger to fester?
whoever insults his brother will be liable to the council;
  • Literally, whoever calls his brother Raca. This Aramaic word expresses contempt for someone’s intelligence (as in idiot, blockhead, ignoramus)
  • The word used for council can also be translated tribunal.  It refers to a type of court. The same word is used for the Jewish ruling council (Sanhedrin) that later condemned Jesus.
  • Jesus is not literally saying that anyone who insults a brother or sister is going to have to appear in a human court. He’s speaking figuratively about the court of heaven.
  • What does it say about us when we indulge ourselves in insults?
and whoever says, ‘You fool!’ will be liable to the hell of fire.
  • The word translated “You fool” may be from the same root as our English word moron. If you said this to someone, you were disparaging not their intelligence so much as their character.
  • The word translated hell of fire (Aramaic Gehenna) is a reference to the valley of Ge Hinnom outside Jerusalem.  This word was used several times by Jesus as a simile for hell.

Gehenna originally was a valley west and south of Jerusalem where children were burned as sacrifices to the Ammonite god Moloch. This practice was carried out by the Israelites during the reigns of King Solomon in the 10th century BC and King Manasseh in the 7th century BC and continued until the Babylonian Exile in the 6th century BC. Gehenna later was made a garbage centre to discourage a reintroduction of such sacrifices.
The imagery of the burning of humans supplied the concept of “hellfire” to Jewish and Christian eschatology. (Encyclopedia Britannica, April 18, 2023)

  • See Romans 2:1. Why does Paul warn us against disparaging the moral character of others?

Worship and reconcilation – verses 23-24

So if you are offering your gift at the altar and there remember that your brother has something against you, leave your gift there before the altar and go. First be reconciled to your brother, and then come and offer your gift.

Jesus is speaking in the context of Jewish temple worship. In our context, we might say “If you are singing a hymn at church and remember that your brother has something against you, go and be reconciled to your brother or sister, then come and worship God”.

  • In the previous section, Jesus was talking about what to do when you are offended with someone else, and harboring malice against them. Now he addresses the topic of what to do if you are the one who has wronged or offended another (your brother has something against you).
  • Why is it important to seek reconciliation with your brother or sister if you want your worship to be pleasing to God?

Settling debts – verses 25-26

Come to terms quickly with your accuser while you are going with him to court, lest your accuser hand you over to the judge, and the judge to the guard, and you be put in prison. Truly, I say to you, you will never get out until you have paid the last penny.

In the Jewish courts of the day, if someone was going to sue you for an unpaid debt, you had one last chance to settle with your accuser on the way to court, but once you got to court it was too late. You were likely going to jail.

For Christians, Satan is our ultimate accuser. If we have unpaid debts (matters we have not made right with God), he has legitimate grounds to accuse us.

  • Why is it wise to settle issues with others without delay?
  • How can this practice help us maintain peace in human relationships?
  • Why is it essential to our relationship with God?
  • Why is it unwise and even dangerous to delay repentance?

 

Share Button